Original data
Research
Findings from our own clinics and patient conversations — not summaries of other people's studies.
Most health content online repeats the same few journal papers. We publish the opposite: numbers that only a clinic network can produce, from our own records and our own patients.
Every piece here names its data source, the size of the sample, and the period it covers. A physician reviews each one before it goes up. Where a number is small or early, we say so on the page rather than in a footnote.
Three sources feed this work. The first is the question corpus — thousands of real questions men asked our coordinators over two to three years. The second is booking and response data across 29 clinics. The third is treatment records, in aggregate and never tied to a person.
How to read the numbers
Every figure is a count or a rate over a stated sample and period, and the page says which. Percentages are of the sample named beside them, never of an unstated total. Where a clinic or a city is small enough that a rate would identify a patient, the number is pooled or withheld; nothing here contains protected health information, and no piece is built from a single patient's record.
What this program does not do: summarise other people's journal papers as if they were ours, quote a satisfaction rate as if it were a clinical outcome, or present a marketing count as data. The 4.9★ Google rating across 162 reviews is a review figure and is labelled as one wherever it appears; the 3,000+ procedures figure is the network's count, not a study.
Published pieces
- What 1,336 patient questions tell us — We read years of real patient questions. Here is what men want to know before girth enhancement — ranked by how often they asked.
Nothing here is medical advice, and none of it identifies a patient. For what a treatment costs and how it works, see pricing and the procedures. For what men ask most, see the questions page.